Overcoming Unwanted Brand Associations

Mark RitsonMarch 10, 20153 min

When the concept of near field communication payment, or NFC mobile payment platforms, as they are known, became popular at the start of the decade, there was a rush from several suppliers to claim the lead.

A payment method that used your mobile phone, or even the case you carried it in, to make small instantaneous purchases held all kind of advantages over more traditional forms of payment.

With big players such as Google intent on owning the space, three US mobile networks, Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile, joined forces to create their own network-backed NFC wallet.

In 2010, the nascent company chose Michael Abbott, the former chief marketing officer of GE Capital, as its new chief executive and set about building the offer. Abbott, who is no stranger to start-up businesses, was unconcerned about Google’s head start: “Lycos and AltaVista were first in online search,” he explained to Forbes magazine in 2011. “This is not about being first but getting it right.”

Alas, things started to go wrong for Abbott when he opted for a brand name that “captured the simplicity of our mobile wallet experience”. He called his new company Isis.

I have sympathy for him and his now tainted organization. How was he to know that less than three years later a name that communicated simplicity and peace would be associated with insurgent Islamic fighters and the creation of a paramilitary Caliphate? Unlike other branding unfortunates who rebranded themselves despite their ignorance of the negative association that their new name evoked, Isis could not have predicted the disastrous associations ahead. Mitsubishi should have known that a pajero was a Spanish man who masturbated himself into unconsciousness before it used it for its latest 4X4. Just as Ernst & Young should have checked before it renamed its firm after a gay, soft porn magazine. These companies had it coming to them but Isis was plain unlucky.

So what are the branding options available to Isis in light of the rise of its deadly namesake to one of the prominent and threatening names today? There are four options.

First, rebrand. In the face of what can only be a stream of negative associations, the company could simply move fast to shift identity before any real damage is done. It’s a tricky option because Isis has successfully spent the past three years building both strong brand awareness and a very attractive position in the market.

Option two is to use its positioning to differentiate between the insurgent Sunni warriors intent on global domination, and the simple, hi-tech application that allows you to buy things on the move. With a decent agency and a small pile of cash, I am sure a ‘big idea’ could create enough perceptual distance. I would probably go outdoor with a bit of search optimization but, hey, I am no expert.

Option three is more risky but speaks to the classic branding strategy of turning a crisis into an opportunity. You have unintentionally become associated with one of the world’s most feared organizations but why not consider adopting some of your namesake’s trademark (and highly distinctive) identity for your own approach? Grow beards, adopt a black flag as your logo and start calling all your competitors infidels. It might not be as crazy as it sounds.

Finally, my favored option is to wait it out. You got there first and Islamic fundamentalists are probably just as unhappy with the association with a western, capitalist operation based in Manhattan as you are with them.

It would appear that Abbott’s Isis has decided to opt for the first option and rebrand its organization. “We have no interest in sharing a name with a group whose name has become synonymous with violence,” Abbott wrote. His company will continue to operate while searching for a new, untainted brand name.

It’s a shame because reports suggest that option four would have worked. Recently, a spokesman for Isis (the insurgent group) announced that it had rebranded with the more catchy name of Islamic State and dropped the four letter acronym. No word on who did the work but anyone want to hazard a guess on the branding agency?

This thought piece is featured courtesy of Marketing Week, the United Kingdom’s leading marketing publication.

The Blake Project Can Help: The Brand Positioning Workshop

Branding Strategy Insider is a service of The Blake Project: A strategic brand consultancy specializing in Brand Research, Brand Strategy, Brand Licensing and Brand Education

FREE Publications And Resources For Marketers

Mark Ritson

One comment

  • Allen Mather Jr

    March 15, 2015 at 10:56 am

    Mark,
    A very unfortunate situation for Mr. Abbott and his company. Perhaps they should try “Osiris” next. Whatever their agency recommends let’s hope the new “untainted brand names” will not include “Boko Buy” or “Cutpurse NFC”…

Comments are closed.

Connect With Us