avatar_48x48
Contact BSI
Derrick Daye
888.706.5489 Email us
Branding and Social Media

Brands And Social Media: The Imaginary Revolution

by

Social Media Facebook

In 2007, a young Mark Zuckerberg nervously addressed a room filled with analysts to predict the future. “The next 100 years are going to be different for advertisers starting today,” he announced. “For the last 100 years media has been pushed out to people, but now marketers are going to be a part of the conversation.”

That day, his presentation announced that brands were becoming an official part of the Facebook universe. Users would start to ‘like’ brands on the social network and communicate with and around them; Zuckerberg called this “social ads”. “Nothing influences people more than a recommendation from a trusted friend,” he said. “A trusted referral is the holy grail of advertising.”

His speech ushered in a new era of social media. Agencies sprung up promising client services predicated on Zuckerberg’s vision of a more social, interactive approach to marketing communication. Rather than the traditional one-way model of mass communication, the agencies offered to ‘engage’ with consumers and start ‘conversations’ with them on behalf of clients.

But there were two problems with Zuckerberg’s vision. First, it assumed brands were as interesting as people. In reality, most people used social media as social media (stay with me) and eschewed contact with brands. Second, Facebook made more money offering brands the opportunity to buy audiences rather than developing naturalistic ones. Over time Facebook began to limit the amount of organic reach brands could achieve with their Facebook fans in order to monetize the contact process and drive their advertising model. These two factors ensured that even if social media did have the potential to allow a dialogue between brands and consumers, it was a conversation that only a tiny fraction could hear and an even more tiny proportion would respond to.

“Any marketers who believe they’re having a conversation on Facebook are delusional,” said Forrester Research vice-president Nate Elliott last year. “Facebook’s shift from free organic reach to paid reach…means that Facebook has abandoned the social marketing it always promised brands, to the type of advertising model that brands can already buy on Yahoo, NBC, and elsewhere,” he opined.

And he has a point. Facebook has become another advertising medium – a medium with superior targeting analytics and a better pay per exposure model – but a one-way advertising medium nonetheless. Bold predictions of new paradigms of conversations and engagement disappeared and were replaced with CPM, CPC and all the other remarkably standardized concepts of advertising.

It would be wrong to pick on Facebook as being anything other than at the vanguard of this re-traditionalizing of social media. Reports that Twitter is considering a business model in which it monetizes tweets viewed by non-users that appear on news feeds or broadcast media tells us all we need to know about the degree to which it has also shifted to an essentially one-way, broadcast approach to pay the bills. The fact that it is also mulling the possibility of launching promoted videos this year that automatically play six-second previews in your Twitter feed to entice you to watch the full video provides even more blatant evidence.

Most social media sites have discovered they might be able to host organic, interactive social activity but they can’t make money out of it. So the interaction becomes the program content and paid advertising surrounds, invades and precedes it at every point. Social media adherents might call it ‘native’ or ‘social’ advertising or create new terminology such as ‘pre-roll’ and ‘Trueview’ to infer some form of new approach, but these tools are all as old as marketing itself.

Paradoxically, this more traditional model of advertising is very lucrative and does silence strident critics of social media (me) who have been crying wolf about the flagrant ridiculousness of social media’s revolutionary claims of interaction and its overbearing predictions of the death of traditional media. In reality, social media is not going to change marketing, it’s just going to augment the industry with a few more media. Traditional advertising isn’t dead, it’s just got new channels to play with.

This thought piece is featured courtesy of Marketing Week, the United Kingdom’s leading marketing publication.

The Blake Project Can Help: The Strategic Brand Storytelling Workshop

Branding Strategy Insider is a service of The Blake Project: A strategic brand consultancy specializing in Brand Research, Brand Strategy, Brand Licensing and Brand Education

FREE Publications And Resources For Marketers

Recommend this story

Subscribe, Follow and Stay Connected to BSI

Submit

1 Comment

George Baily
Twitter: knowledgepowers
on February 22nd, 2015 said

Interesting challenge that social media are “re-traditionalizing”… partly couldn’t we say this was always going to happen as (a) the large companies with big advertising budgets would be willing to spend on a display/interruptive model they (and their agencies) recognize, (b) these same companies would find it hard to change course to a new way of working in social media (at least hard to do so quickly, if indeed such a way can really exist, as you fairly challenge), and (c) as the social media companies themselves became bigger and more corporate and so started thinking traditionally per a+b.
However, this is not to say some brands will not have success in the more original and social concept of the medium. But it’s an excellent question to to ask, how exactly that is supposed to work as a commercial win plus audience/community win.

Leave a Reply

Submit your comment