Contact BSI
Derrick Daye
888.706.5489 Email us
Derrick Daye Luxury Branding

The Anti-laws Of Luxury Marketing #19


Luxury Brand Strategy

19. Do not test

Luxury companies do not test among consumers. If you
test you are a mass 
prestige company. Coach does use a lot of tests, as any
traditional marketing 
company: in fact 80 per cent of its new products are
tested. Louis Vuitton, 
Chanel, or Hermès never test. Testing means that the
decisions of the luxury 
brand are subject to the taste of the consumers. Fast moving consumer goods (
FMCG) companies thrive by trying to solve a consumer
problem: they need to 
ask what is the current problem and does the advertising
show effectively 
how much the product solves the problem. Mass-prestige brands
such as 
Chivas or SK2 do tests. It is normal: the goal of their advertising is
to build 
sales, with fast returns.

Luxury is a taste educator. It builds the classics
of tomorrow not the hits of today, soon forgotten. To do so, one cannot rely on
today’s preferences. Luxury’s avant-garde status is reinforced by the fact that
its messages are mysterious, not easily grasped. The same holds true for art: a
mass-prestige brand would always check if the music it chooses is liked by the
target. Luxury brands aim at pricing power based on the status of the brand
itself as an emitter, shaping the taste of elites.

problem with tests is that of the selection of respondents. This asks a fundamental question: who
should be considered as a luxury consumer?

Does buying a fragrance at
Sephora’s qualify you as luxury consumer? What kind of people do agree to take
some of their time to answer questions on an advertisement? Beyond the
relevance of the questioning itself, there is a tendency of most research and
survey institutes to interview larger and larger proportions of the population.
Thus some brands consider that it is normal to interview the upper 50 per cent
of the population of developed countries. Obviously they can buy a fragrance, a
lipstick or a small accessory but what about a bag costing $5,000? There is a growing
tendency to accept these samples as normal: they are for the mass prestige
brands, such as Lacoste or Hugo Boss or Ralph Lauren. Why should they concern
the luxury brands?

However, it is legitimate for a
luxury brand to test new products with a selection of existing good customers
of the brand, and especially on the shop floor, where a real face-to-face
discussion is possible. Not only is the opinion of these brand-lovers good to
collect, as they share the dream of the brand, but also it helps them to feel
more ‘part of the club’, enhancing their brand loyalty.

You can even go further. By
asking its customers, through the internet, their opinion on a new television
campaign – more precisely, by asking them to vote between two campaigns –
Nespresso made an excellent move both in its relationship with its customers
and in the validation of the final decision. 

Contributed to Branding Strategy Insider by: JN Kapferer, excerpted from his book, The Luxury Strategy with permission from Kogan Page publishing.

See all of the Anti-laws of Luxury Marketing here.

Sponsored ByThe Brand Positioning Workshop

FREE Publications And Resources For Marketers

Recommend this story

Subscribe, Follow and Stay Connected to BSI


Leave a Reply

Submit your comment

More posts in Derrick Daye Luxury Branding

The Anti-laws Of Luxury Marketing #23

The Anti-laws Of Luxury Marketing #21

The Anti-laws Of Luxury Marketing #20

The Anti-laws Of Luxury Marketing #19

Brand Loyalty Rewards For The Ultra-Luxury Shopper

The Anti-laws Of Luxury Marketing #18

The Anti-laws Of Luxury Marketing #17

The Anti-laws Of Luxury Marketing #16