Search


  • WWW
    This Blog

  • Add to Technorati Favorites

About The Authors

  • Derrick Daye
    Managing Partner
    Email Derrick
    Derrick has spent the past 18 years helping organizations release the full potential of their brands. His experience is as deep as it is diverse encompassing the disciplines of advertising, branding, sales promotion and public relations. Most notably he has worked with the White House Press Corps, Johnson & Johnson and the National Basketball Association.

    Call The Blake Project - here's my cell:
    813.842.2260
  • Brad VanAuken
    Chief Brand Strategist
    Email Brad
    Recognized as one of the world’s leading experts on brand management and marketing, Brad wrote the best selling book Brand Aid, the first comprehensive practical, ‘how-to’ guide on building winning brands. A much sought after consultant and speaker, he writes extensively for the business press and academic journals and is regularly quoted in trade publications.

Top Posts

BSI Visitor Map

  • Locations of visitors to this page

Recognition

  • TypePad Featured Weblog
  • Ad Age Power 150

    Featured in Alltop 9 Rules Member

« Marketers: Bastards of the Business World | Main | Financial Implications of Brand Consolidation »

October 11, 2008

Evaluating Print Advertising Effectiveness

When evaluating the potential effectiveness of different print campaign ideas, I use the following questions:

•    Does the headline immediately “grab” the reader? (In advertising guru David Ogilvy’s book Ogilvy on Advertising, Ogilvy states that five times as many people read headlines as read body copy.)  Ideally, the headline is nine words or less.
•    Does the headline promise an important benefit? (Ogilvy also states in Ogilvy on Advertising that ads with headlines that promise benefits are read by four times more people than those that don’t.)
•    Is the body copy long enough to provide the reader with useful information and ample proof points for your brand’s promise?  Long copy is more effective than short copy.  This is particularly true for business-to-business advertising.  (Alternatively, Roper Starch Worldwide, which maintains a database of more than 2,000,000 print ads, has found that excessive copy reduces the effectiveness of ads and recommends keeping ad copy to 50 words or less. With whole generations having now grown up on “sound bytes” of information, some cohort groups will respond better to shorter copy.)
•    Increasing white space around the ad or the headline increases the ad’s effectiveness.

Print Advertising offers several benefits: good reach and frequency, can handle complicated propositions, reaches consumers in a receptive context and can be very targeted.

In the days ahead I will share my thoughts on other advertising vehicles here on BSI.

Sponsored By: Brand Aid

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b74a69e201053573e361970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Evaluating Print Advertising Effectiveness:

Comments

I like your blog but I cant agree with this kind of rubbish. Some of the most effective campaigns in history don't use headlines, or text. Look at The Economist's ads for christ sake.

Luis,

That's it? No wisdom for campaigns with headlines or text to share?

Step up.

Derrick

I find it odd that long copy works better than short copy. I would think since people’s attention spans are so short anymore that shorter copy would work better. When I see a long ad in a magazine (I hate those ads that look like magazine editorial copy) I don’t even want to take the time to read all that to find out what it’s about. I guess that’s why the headline is so important; if I were interested, I suppose I’d read the whole ad. It just looks so tiring to see so many paragraphs that I think long ads turn people (like me) off.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Partners

  • FREE Marketing Magazine Subscriptions Restaurant Coaching Solutions Scent Marketing Institute CI Sense Free Subscription

Prefer email to a blog?

  • Sign up below and we'll send new posts to your email inbox. We'll never spam, sell or trade your address.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

BSI on your Phone or Blog

  • Our Feed In A Widget

    Get this widget from Widgetbox
  • Our Feed On Your Phone

Featured Reading

2008 Brand Education Seminars



  • The Blake Project offers comprehensive seminars on many key branding topics. They are designed to educate and empower executives, brand managers and marketing professionals to release the full potential of their brands. Download 2008BrandEducation.pdf (675.2K)

Subscribe to the Brand Management Newsletter


  • A leading source for brand management insight, strategy and advice for marketing oriented leaders and professionals.







Sounds of BSI

Follow BSI

Top Ten

  • Benefits of Building Strong Brands
    1. Increased revenues and market share
    2. Decreased price sensitivity
    3. Increased customer loyalty
    4. Additional leverage with vendors and retailers (for manufacturers)
    5. Increased profitability
    6. Increased stock price, shareholder value and sale value
    7. Increased clarity of vision
    8. Increased ability to mobilize an organization's people and focus its activities
    9. Increased ability to expand into new product and service categories
    10. Increased ability to attract and retain high quality employees