Search


  • WWW
    This Blog

  • Add to Technorati Favorites

About The Authors

  • Derrick Daye
    Managing Partner
    Email Derrick
    Derrick has spent the past 18 years helping organizations release the full potential of their brands. His experience is as deep as it is diverse encompassing the disciplines of advertising, branding, sales promotion and public relations. Most notably he has worked with the White House Press Corps, Johnson & Johnson and the National Basketball Association.

    Call The Blake Project - here's my cell:
    813.842.2260
  • Brad VanAuken
    Chief Brand Strategist
    Email Brad
    Recognized as one of the world’s leading experts on brand management and marketing, Brad wrote the best selling book Brand Aid, the first comprehensive practical, ‘how-to’ guide on building winning brands. A much sought after consultant and speaker, he writes extensively for the business press and academic journals and is regularly quoted in trade publications.

Categories

Top Posts

Recognition

  • TypePad Featured Weblog
  • Ad Age Power 150

    Featured in Alltop 9 Rules Member

« Top Brands Illustrate Marketing Power | Main | BrandQuote - April 26 »

April 25, 2008

Beware of Brand Schizophrenia

Powerful brands have distinct personalities: Duracell’s batteries last a long time. Volvos are safe in a crash. But even dominant brands can fade if they fall prey to multiple personality disorder.

Consider General Motors. What’s the difference between a Chevrolet, a Pontiac and a Buick? The company has woken up to the problem in recent times; In 2005 GM announced it would narrow its selection of cars. But this belated effort to bring the automaker’s brand schizophrenia under control is too little too late.

General Motors mucked up its brands over decades of endless line extensions. But Mercedes Benz has done it in less than one decade. Once upon a time, it was a high-quality, highly engineered, prestigious car. But now, if you wander into a dealership in Europe, you’re faced with the following lineup: A-Class, B-Class, C-Class, E-Class, S-Class, CLK, CLS, CL, SLK, SL, M-Class and G-Class. The prices range from 20,000 to 200,000 euros. The result is that in Europe, Mercedes Benz is not listed as the top brand. The Audi A8, BMW, Maserati and Jaguar have taken over this position.

The GM and Mercedes stories are not unique. Once a company abandons its brands' distinctive personalities or positions, it's just a matter of time before confused customers start to drift away. In 1985, Coca-Cola infamously introduced an identity-blurring new brand, New Coke. A massive consumer backlash ensued, and the company quickly reinstated its familiar Classic Coke.

You’d think Coca-Cola would have learned from that experience the importance of having a unique product personality.

But today the company sells 16 versions of Coke, including such strange variations as Coca-Cola Zero, Diet Coke with Splenda, and Coca-Cola C2. What’s a Coke? It’s no wonder the company has lost its fizz.

There are ways to execute line extensions without confusing, and losing, your customers. What these strategies share in common is rigorous attention to the brand’s position--consumers' sense of the brand's distinct, overarching identity. BMW, for example, has been for decades "the ultimate driving machine," an identity that transcends the company's multiple product lines. Managed carefully, a good position is timeless. The "ultimate driving machine" is now 33 years old, "Marlboro Country" is 54 and "a diamond is forever" is 60.

What you have to fight off is the tendency of marketing people to tinker with a brand. After all, how else can they make their mark? I have rarely seen a marketing person arrive at a new assignment and say, "Things look pretty good, let’s not touch a thing." The next thing you know, you're about to come down with a bad case of brand schizophrenia.

But what's worse is a marketing executive who announces that brand schizophrenia is a good thing. Such was the case with Larry Light, the ex-chief marketing officer of McDonald’s, when in a speech he said that "brand chronicles" or multiple messages (i.e., personalities) was the way to go, as opposed to brand positioning.

Should BMW abandon its long-term positioning strategy of being "the ultimate driving machine"? Should it go the way of Chevrolet, whose drive to be everything for everybody has resulted in its becoming nothing in the mind? (What's a Chevrolet?)

Positioning is how you differentiate yourself. Staying focused on that position is how you survive in a brutally competitive world. Ever since Coca-Cola dropped its heritage-positioning strategy with "the real thing," things haven’t gone well for Coke. Luckily, Pepsi left its youth-positioning strategy with "choice of the new generation" and kept things from getting worse.

Has it ever occurred to you that McDonald's was looking for slogans and not a positioning strategy? There's one that's right on the bottom of its sign that announces how many hamburgers you've been served. McDonald's, with its international reach and billions of hamburgers served, is staring at what I would call a very powerful leadership-positioning strategy. And it’s the one that would indeed encompass what you describe as a multidimensional brand.

The obvious positioning strategy: "The World’s Favorite Place to Eat."

I’m sorry, Larry, "brand chronicles" are not the way of the future. It’s only a way of turning a brand that stands for something into a brand that stands for nothing.

Sponsored By: Brand Aid

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b74a69e200e5520f7d908834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Beware of Brand Schizophrenia :

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Partners

  • +2 marketing Consultants FREE Marketing Magazine Subscriptions Scent Marketing Institute CI Sense Free Subscription

Prefer email to a blog?

  • Sign up below and we'll send new posts to your email inbox. We'll never spam, sell or trade your address.

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

BSI on your Phone or Blog

  • Our Feed In A Widget

    Get this widget from Widgetbox
  • Our Feed On Your Phone

Featured Reading

2009 Brand Education Seminars



  • The Blake Project offers comprehensive seminars on many key branding topics. They are designed to educate and empower executives, brand managers and marketing professionals to release the full potential of their brands. Download 2008BrandEducation.pdf (675.2K)

Subscribe to the Brand Management Newsletter


  • A leading source for brand management insight, strategy and advice for marketing oriented leaders and professionals.







Follow BSI

Top Ten

  • Benefits of Building Strong Brands
    1. Increased revenues and market share
    2. Decreased price sensitivity
    3. Increased customer loyalty
    4. Additional leverage with vendors and retailers (for manufacturers)
    5. Increased profitability
    6. Increased stock price, shareholder value and sale value
    7. Increased clarity of vision
    8. Increased ability to mobilize an organization's people and focus its activities
    9. Increased ability to expand into new product and service categories
    10. Increased ability to attract and retain high quality employees